The evolution of subregional cooperation among European nations in security and defense area is the topic of the article. It describes sub-regionalism as a phenomenon and explains the reasons why small states of Europe are eager to cooperate in defense area after the end of the Cold War. Such coopera- tion is analyzed within the broader context of European integration – a trend which still has a great impact on sub-regional cooperation in certain parts of a common EU and NATO space.
According to the article former socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe as well as some Eu- ropean neutral states viewed sub-regional groupings as means of security enhancement in a period of transition – a time when these countries were getting ready for fully- edged integration into European or Euro-Atlantic organizations. Nevertheless, subregional groupings have become even more relevant while EU and NATO enlargements were slowing down. So called threat perception gap among individual members of the EU and NATO contributed to forming of small subregional groupings based on members’ security common vision and their aspiration to reach common goals. These groupings estimated as marginal by pan –European organizations, are extremely important for the grouped countries themselves. For European Union and the North Atlantic Alliance it is not easy to govern these subregional trends of multinational cooperation and synchronize them with European and Euro-Atlantic integration as such.
Key words: subregionalism, regionalism, subregional groupings, defense cooperation, NATO, European Union, CFSP, CSDP, European integration, EU battle groups.
References
1. Bajkov A.A. Mezhdunarodnaja integracija v teoreticheskom diskurse [International integration in theoretical dis- course]. Megatrendy: osnovnye traektorii jevoljucii mirovogo porjadka v XXI veke [Megatrends: world order evolu- tion in the 21 century]. Ed. by A.A Baikov, T.A. Shakleina. Moscow, Aspect-press Publ., 2013. Pp. 143-162. (In Russian)
2. Katona V. Manifest vostochnoevropejskogo atlantizma [A Manifesto for Eastern European Atlanticism]. Rus- sian International A airs Council, 01.10.2015. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/inner/?id_4=6552#top- content (In Russian). (Accessed 16.11.15).
3. Nikitina Ju. A. Ot integracii k regionalizmu: jevoljucija teorij regional'nogo mezhgosudarstvennogo sotrud- nichestva [Evolution of regional interstate cooperation theories]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2010, no. 1, pp. 134-140. (In Russian). (Accessed 16.11.2015).
4. Jur'eva T.V. Problemy regional'noj bezopasnosti: sovremennyj opyt Evropy [Regional issues of security: contemporary experience of Europe]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2010, no 6, pp. 126 - 134. (In Russian).
5. Bailes A. Sub-regional organizations: The Cinderellas of European security. NATO Review, 1997, no. 2, pp. 27 - 31.
6. Bampaliouta E. Illegal Immigration and refugees a new heavy burden for Greece and EU. Lindro, 24.11.2015. Available at: http://www.lindro.it/illegal-immigration-and-refugees-a-new-heavy-burden-for-greece-and-
eu/?pdf=200496 (Accessed 20.11.2015).
7. Building Security in Europe's New Borderlands: Subregional Cooperation in the Wider Europe. Ed. by Renata
Dwan. N.Y., East West Institute, Routledge, 1999. 288 p.
8. Budapest Declaration of the Visegrád Group Heads of Government on the New Opening in V4 Defence
Cooperation. Available at: http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/visegrad-countries-may-turn-
eu-battlegroup-into-permanent-v4-rapid-reaction-force (Accessed 30.10.15).
9. Cameron F. EU Enlargement and European Security. The Challenge of NATO Enlargement. Ed. by Anton
Bebler. Greenwood Publishing, 1999. Pp. 48 – 49.
10. Cottey A. Sub-regional Cooperation in Europe: An Assessment. BRIGG Paper, 2009, no 3. Available at: http://
aei.pitt.edu/33535/ (Accessed 12.10.2015).
11. Cihelková Eva, l Hnát P. Subregionalism Within the EU with Special Regard to the Groupings of which the
Czech Republic is a Member. Prague Economic Papers, 2006, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 51 – 52.
12. Dahl A. NORDEFCO and NATO: “Smart defence” in the North. NATO Research Paper, 2014, no. 101, p. 6.
13. Dickow M., Linnenkamp H., Maulny J., Terlikowski M. Weimar Defence Cooperation – Projects to Respond
to the European Imperative. Report of the Polish Institute of International A airs. Warsaw, 2011. Available at: http://www.pism.pl/ les/?id_plik=10417 (Accessed: 22.11.2015).
14. Goure D.NATO’s Last Chance. Invest Its Scarce Resources Wisely of Accept Strategic Irrelevance. Lexington Institute. February 2014. Available at: http://lexingtoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/NATOs- Last-Chance.pdf (Accessed: 10.11.2015).
15. Manoli P. The Dynamics of Black Sea Subregionalism. Burlington, Ashgate Publishing, 2012. 239 p.
16. Johnson P., LaBenz T., and Driver D. Brave New Approach or Déjà Vu? Naval War College Review, Summer
2013, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 39-51.
17. Kavaliauskas T. Transformations in Central Europe between 1989 and 2012: Geopolitical, Cultural, and
Socioeconomic Shifts. Lanham, Lexington Books. 2012, 120 p.
18. Nemeth, B., & Csiki, Perspectives of Central European Multinational Defense Cooperation: A New Model?
Ed. by M. Majer, & R. Ondrejcsák. Panorama of Global Security Environment Centre for European and North
Atlantic A airs. Bratislava, 2013, pp. 11 - 24.
19. Németh B. Why don’t Europeans use NATO and the EU? Europe’s World. 19.03.2014. Available at: http://
europesworld.org/2014/03/19/why-dont-europeans-use-nato-and-eu/ (Accessed: 15.12.2015).
20. Nič M. The Ukraine crisis and the Visegrad Group: What kind of a regional approach? Regional Defense Cooperation: Lessons from Norden and Visegrad. Report from seminar organized by Institute of European Studies and International Relations, Comenius University and Norwegian Institute of International A airs (NUPI). Bratislava, December 8, 2014. Available at: http://staryweb.fses.uniba.sk/ leadmin/user_upload/
editors/UESMV/Documents/FSEV_CONT_2_small.pdf (Accessed: 21.12.2015).
21. O’Dwyer, G. Proposed Nordic Joint Tactical Air Transport Wing Progresses. Defence News, 21.06.2013.
Available at: http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130621/DEFREG01/306210012/Proposed-Nordic-
Joint-Tactical-Air-Transport-Wing-Progresses (Accessed: 23.10.2015).
22. Rachman G. The U.S. Pivot to Asia – Should Europeans Worry? The Center for European Policy Analysis,
02.04.2012. Available at: http://www.cepa.org/content/us-pivot-asia-–-should-europeans-worry (Accessed:
02.11.2015).
23. Ruxandra I. New Regionalism or No Regionalism? Emerging Regionalism in the Black Sea Area. Burlington:
Ashgate Publishing, 2013. 6 p.
24. Sapronas R. BALTBAT and development of Baltic Defence Forces. Baltic Defence Review, 1999, no. 2, pp. 55 - 70.
25. Voss A, Major C., Molling C. The State of Defence Cooperation in Europe. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik
Working Paper, December 2013, no. 3, p. 7.
