The article conducts a political analysis of the Western European institutions of corporatism. The main task of the author is the study of the policy of harmonizing the interests of labor and capital (trade unions and employers’ associations), which is implemented in countries such as the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Denmark etc. Dynamics of political processes unfolding in the space of Western Europe, suggests that the mechanisms of articulation and political representation of social and labour interests have significantly transformed over the past 30 years. The use of institutional and systemic approaches along with the empirical methods, leads to the conclusion that the most developed European countries are moving from the classical model of corporatism to a more pluralistic forms of interaction between the state, labour and capital. Social partnership as an instrument of collective bargaining between employees and employers is displaced from the political sphere to the sectoral and organizational levels. The typical institutions of democratic corporatism (tripartite commissions, socio-economic councils, etc.), who played a crucial role in rebuilding postwar Europe, become rudimentary organs of the national political systems. In addition, there is a tendency to weaken the political influence of trade unions, who successfully struggled for the satisfaction of collective demands of workers in the beginning of XX century. Large multinational companies prefer to influence the political decision-making centers autonomously, ignoring the associative membership in the guild organizations. As a consequence, corporatist bargaining is being replaced by direct and indirect lobbying, Government Relations and election fundraising. When accounting for identified trends, the author presents a hypothesis that the evolution of corporatism in Western Europe will lead to its gradual degeneration. Taking into account the identified trends, the author presents a hypothesis that the evolution of corporatism in Western Europe leads to its gradual degeneration.
Key words: corporatism, tripartism, a political coordination of interests, civil society, labor party, trade unions, lobbying.
References
1. Baccaro L. The Construction of “Democratic” Corporatism in Italy. Politics and Society, 2002, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 327-357
2. Jensen K.S. Trade Unionism: Differences and Similarities – A Comparative View on Europe, USA and Asia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 2006, vol. 48, iss. 1, pp. 59-81. DOI: 10.1177/0022185606059314.
3. Jessop R.D. From Thatcherism to New Labour: neo-Liberalism, workfarism, and labour market regulation. The political economy of European employment: European integration and the transnationalization of the (un)employment question. London, Routledge Publ., 2003. Pp. 137-153.
4. Jorgensen H. The Role of the Trade Unions in Social Restructuring in Scandinavia in the 1990s. Revue Francaise Des Affaires Sociales, 2003, iss. 4, pp. 151-176. 5. Katzenstein P.J. Corporatism and Change, Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press Publ., 1984. 334 p.
6. Norton P. The British Polity. New York, Routledge Publ., 2010. 496 p.
7. Ringe A. The national economic development council 1962–67. Contemporary British History, 1998, vol. 12, pp. 99-130. DOI: 10.1080/13619469808581471
8. Svensson N., Oberg P.O. Labour Market Organizations Participation in Swedish Public Policy-Making. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2002, vol. 25, pp. 295-316.
9. Stubbs R., Underhill G. Political Economy and the Changing Global Order. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 1994. 561 p.
10. Streeck W., Hassel A. Trade Unions as Political Actors. International Handbook of Trade Unions. Edward Elgar Publ., 2003. Pp. 335-365.
11. Schmitter P.C. Still the Century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 1974, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 85-131. 12. Wiarda H.G. Corporatism and Comparative Politics: The Other Great “Ism”. New York, Routledge Publ., 1996. 212 p.
