The paper deals with the range of problems regarding the relation between decisions of political elite in small states and their striving for occupying a certain niche in external (foreign) political environment. The typology of such niches is proposed.
The article deals with economic, military, political, and ideological dimensions of political elites’ decisions in the Baltic states. The article makes the case of the following hypothesis: the exploitation of the “Russian threat” concept by political elites of the Baltic states is aimed at occupying a special niche within the Euro-Atlantic community. The narrow corridor for political maneuver imposed by strategic imperatives of NATO induces political elites of the Baltic states to attract attention of powerful states, which brings resources, nances and more prominent status. Inciting confrontation with Russia serves as a means for internal political consolidation, proving loyalty towards NATO, and contributes to individual careers of politicians with the EU institutions. The choice of ‘con ict model’ entails side-e ects: slowdown of social and economic development in the long run.
The following research inference is made: by means of con ict model which is being realized within external political niche (“gate-keeper” and “missionary” types) political elite of the Baltic states gain additional resources in the middle-term perspective. However, in the long term this political course generally reduces opportunities for political and economic development of small states.
In theoretical and methodological dimension the research results con rm productivity of three-level analysis approach towards activity of political elite. The most general level of analysis deals with empire units of international relations which structure the environment for small states’ elites actions. At the middle level it is possible scrutinize di erent varieties of external (foreign) political niches available to a certain small state. The third level of analysis deals with investigation of concrete economic, military, political and ideological decisions of political elite within a certain external (foreign) political niche.
Key words: political elite, Baltic states, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, NATO, infrastructure, foreign policy niche.
References
1. Bogaturov A. Sovremennyj mir: sistema ili konglomerat? Opyt transsistemnogo podhoda [The Modern World: System of Conglomerate? Application of trans-system approach]. Ocherki teorii i politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij. Moscow: NOFMO, 2002. P.129-144. (In Russian).
2. Grigoriev L. Strany Baltii: v poiskah vyhoda iz krizisa [Baltic States in search of a way out from the crisis]. Voprosy jekonomiki. – 2010. – No 4. – S. 121-138. (In Russian).
3. Koncepcija vneshnej politiki Rossijskoj Federacii // Diplomaticheskij vestnik. 1993. No 1-2. S. 3-23.
4. Koncepcija vneshnej politiki Rossijskoj Federacii ot 12 fevralja 2013 g. Available at: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/
documents/2/25.html (Accessed: 03.02.2015).
5. Lavrov S.V. Rossija i mir v XXI veke [Russia and the World in XXI century] // Rossija v global'noj politike. 2008. No 4. Available at: www.globala airs.ru/number/n_11159 (Accessed: 03.06.2015).
6. Mezhevich N. Vneshnjaja politika gosudarstv Pribaltiki i krupnye infrastrukturnye proekty 2010-2014 godov [Foreign Policy of Baltic States and Major Infrastructure Projects in 2010-2014]. Baltijskij region. 2014. No 1(19). P. 7-28. (In Russian).
7. Otnoshenija Rossii i stran Pribaltiki: ot upushhennyh vozmozhnostej k real'nym perspektivam [Relations between Russia and the Baltic States: from the Lost Opportunities towards Realistic Prospects]. Saint- Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2013. S.6. (In Russian).
8. Primakov E. Vyzovy i al'ternativy mnogopoljarnogo mira: rol' Rossii [Challenges and Opportunities of the Multipolar World: the Role of Russia]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. (In Russian).
9. Sovremennye mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija [Contemporary International Relations] / Pod red. A. V. Torku- nova, A. V. Mal'gina. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2012.
10. Sokolov V. Pochemu Tallin stremitsja na zapad [Why Tallinn is Heading to the West]. Nezavisimaja gazeta. 2001. 21 ijunja. (In Russian).
11. Breuning M. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
12. Colomer J. Great Empires, Small Nations. The Uncertain Future of the Sovereign State. Routledge, 2007.
13. Cooper R. The Breaking of Nations. Order and Chaos in the Twenty- rst Century. New York: Atlantic Monthly
Press, 2003. P.39
14. Grigas A., Kasekamp A., Maslauskaite K., Zorgenfreija L. The Baltic states in the EU: yesterday, today and
tomorrow // Studies & Reports. No 98, Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute, 2013.
15. Honore A. EU requirement to ensure alternative gas supply from 3rd December 2014. Oxford Institute of
Energy Studies, 2014.
16. Keohane R. Lilliputians' Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics // International Organization. 1969.
Vol. 23. P. 291-310.
17. Krugman P. Baltic Brouhaha // New York Times. 2013. May 1.
18. Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World? Small States in International Relations / Ed. by Neumann I., Gstöhl S. Uni-
versity of Iceland, 2004.
19. Military Spending In Europe // Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2015.
20. Moravcsik A. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics // International Orga-
nization. 1997. Vol. 51, No.4. P. 513–553.
21. Planned Agenda of Rail Baltica // Rail Baltic O cial Web-Site. Available at: railbaltica.info/information/
(Accessed: 03.06.2015).
22. Remarks by Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian A airs, Brook-
ings Institution // U.S. Department of State. Available at: http://translations.state.gov/st/english/text-
trans/2015/01/20150127313219.html#ixzz3QfXccKYj (Accessed: 03.02.2015).
23. Small, Smart and Salient? Rethinking Identity in the Small States Literature // Cambridge Review of Inter-
national A airs. 2006. Vol.19. P. 669-684.
24. Small States in International Relations Small States in International Relations / Ed. by Ingebritsen K., Neu-
mann I., Gstöhl S. University of Scandinavia Press, 2006.
25. Thorhallsson B., Wivel A. Small States in the European Union: What Do We Know and What Would We Like
to Know? // Cambridge Review of International A airs. 2006. Vol.19. P. 651-668.
